I love looking at food photography. All my favorite cookbooks have pictures of the food. My favorite food sites all have amazing food photography.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbabf/dbabfe9186b7e12a78ff8ec892706ff8b9fd32c3" alt=""
And then there was this in the paper last Sunday.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6e6c/d6e6c7ff0d091fd36bb54e43b3abe641b0ba604e" alt=""
Spanish-style sausage at B44.
Now, sausage can be tricky to photograph. But when Don flipped to the section and said, "Wow. It looks like a plate of beans and a turd!" What?? I take a look, and he's right. Oh no. This is not good. Especially since we know the owners of the restaurant. How could they let this happen?
I think the Chronicle owes the restaurant an apology and a do-over. It's a great restaurant, with great spanish cuisine. This photo is not going to get people to want to eat there. I guess I'm not helping by showing it again either. But sheesh. Really???? This is the best they could do?
B44 Restaurant in San Francisco. Here's a picture of one of their specialties. Now this looks better.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1dc24/1dc242a83ce258a594876e593467ec5e705b3c11" alt=""
The sausage photo was taken by Peter Desliva. Special to the Chronicle. Shame on you Peter.
Sausages are hard to photograph because of the turd factor or other, ahem, factors!:) When I worked at Best's Kosher, we had whole days spent at the photography studio trying to get one hot dog shot!
ReplyDelete